Step 3
It happens all the time. You go out to
have drink or two with friends, but this time things are different. You’re having a great time, the drinks are good
and are going down easier and easier.
Before you know it the bar is closing and it’s time to go home. Without
thinking you say bye to your friends,
get in your car, and head home. Only two miles away from home the unthinkable
happens. You’ve crossed the center lines and swerved into oncoming
traffic. You’re not sure what
happened after that, things are a little hazy. The bright lights hurt your eyes,
not sure where they came from. There
is an offensive odor surrounding you, and you can hear muffled screams, your head hurts. Who is screaming? Finally
things start to clear up and you are able to stumble out of your car
to see the carnage
that you caused.
The person screaming is in the other car, well it was a car a few
minutes ago. The screaming stops as a rescue team crowds around. Police, fire trucks and ambulance are everywhere. What
have you done? As a police officer
pulls you away from the seen you see a white blanket. What is that for? In
reality you had too much to drink
and have caused a horrible accident. Your life is over now, you killed an innocent person. A nurse coming home from
a 16 hour shift. She was mother of three, a wonderful
wife, and a beautiful women.
She is no more.
Drinking and driving has devastated countless
people’s lives over the years. The
consequences of drinking and driving not only effects the impaired drivers but that of many others, from passengers to others drivers
on the road to pedestrians,
even family members. Driving
under the influence of alcohol is a serious problem in the U.S. According
to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration “alcohol has been
identified as one of the most important
preventable causes of motor
vehicle collisions for more than 4
decades.” (Roudsari, Ramisetty-Mikler,
& Rodriguez, 2009) If this issues is so preventable than why is it still happening, where do we draw
the line? While the national number of fatalities involving alcohol related traffic crashes has gone down in the
recent years. MADD (Mothers Against Drunk Driving)
reports the death toll, from 10,076 fatalities in 2013 to 9,967 fatalities in 2014 ("Number
of Drunk Driving Deaths Dropped Below 10,000 in 2014", 2015). While this isn’t a large number it is still a
decrease. Making the conscious decision to drink and drive can put everyone at risk, even the innocent.
Despite increased public awareness, drinking and drugged driving continues.
What is considered drunk driving? “By
law, a driver is considered to be impaired by
alcohol if his or her blood alcohol content is 0.08 percent (0.08 grams
of alcohol per 100 milliliters of
blood) or higher. A driver is any operator of a motor vehicle, which includes motorcycle, truck, and passenger vehicle.”
(Holzmueller, 2015). While each state has different laws for drinking and driving, they each share the same
foundation laws. “It is illegal to drive with
a blood alcohol content (BAC) of 0.08 percent or higher, the minimum drinking
age to twenty-one years, and each
have established a zero-tolerance law that prohibits people less than twenty-one years of age from driving after
drinking (most zero-tolerance laws set the drinking limit to a BAC of 0.02 percent.).” (Holzmueller, 2015). The
effects that alcohol has on the body can
vary and can depend on consumption and the person. Some zero-tolerance laws set
the legal BAC limit as 0.02%, this is
equal to about two drinks. With a BAC of 0.02% “there is come loss in judgment, altered mood, relaxation
sets in, and the body warms slightly. There is a decline in visual
functions (rapid tracking
of a moving target), and decline
in ability to perform two tasks at the same time (divided
attention).” (“Effects of Blood Alcohol
Concentration (BAC)” (2015).
While this may not seem
significant, but at the national BAC of 0.08%, which is
about 4 drinks,
there is a great change in function. At
0.08% BAC “muscle coordination becomes poor (e.g., balance, speech, vision, reaction time, and hearing), it becomes
harder to detect danger, and judgment,
self-control, reasoning, and memory are impaired,” while this is only what your
body goes through physically, it
effects the way you function. “There is a loss of concentration, speed control, and short term memory loss. There
is reduced information processing capability (e.g., signal detection, visual search) and impaired perception.”
(“Effects of Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC)” (2015).
Any BAC above this point
is 100% illegal.
Alcohol causes normal
brain function to slow, it affects cognitive skills, and hand-eye coordination.
“By some estimates, an individual who
regularly drinks and drives will have done so 80 times before he or she is arrested for a Driving While
Intoxicated (DWI) charge.” (Shah, 2015). So
why do people put themselves and other at such a risk? The reasoning behind a
person’s decision to drink and drive
are many ranging from social influence to usual behavior. “By far the single biggest influence on drinking and
driving decisions comes from environmental influences, primarily those of a social nature. People who made decisions
based on social influences tended to
be younger people, including college students, and to be females. They also
tended to be relatively high on the
socioeconomic ladder, for example, with larger incomes, more education and white collar jobs.” (“Why people drink
and drive: the bases of drinking-and-driving
decisions.” 1995). Peer pressure can be a horrible thing, giving the
feeling that a person has to do something
even when they know it is not right. It is a leading cause for choosing to
drink and drive. A person’s usual behavior can affect the decision to
drink and drive. The reasoning behind this
usual behavior is that the person drinks and drives on a regular bases so why
change that behavior if they have
never been caught. Other factors involved in drinking and driving include age, genders, and time of day or day of the
week. The times between
midnight and 3 a.m. is the
deadliest time of day with a reported
“66 % of all traffic fatalities at this time occurred in alcohol-related crashes and 55 % of drivers
involved in fatal
crashes occur during
this time.”
(Holzmueller,
2015). A person’s age can affect drunk driving as well. In 2013 it was reported that people between the ages of 21 to 24 were
involved in 33 % of fatal crashes, ages 25 to 34 29 % were involved in fatal crashes. As a person ages the percentage
goes down. Out of all the ages involved
in fatal drunk driving crashes men were at a 23% more likely to drink and drive
where as women were at a 15%
(Holzmueller, 2015). As to under-age drinking and driving, “in the general population, the risk of DUI
rapidly increases during adolescence, and the DUI rate doubles between the ages of 16-to-17 years old and 18-to-19
years old.” (Delcher, Johnson, & Maldonado-Molina,
2013). To think that these
kids, not even able to legally
buy alcohol are twice
as likely to drink and drive. The availability of alcohol can be a factor in
drunk driving as well. One study done
in New York shows that the time of day alcohol can be served plays a role in drunk driving. “All counties allow for
businesses to sell alcohol for on-premises consumption starting at 8 a.m. until 1 a.m. or 4 a.m.” (Denson &
Schofield, 2013). That is around 17 to 20 hours
a day that one person has to drink alcohol, get in a car, and drive. While this
study shows a link between first time offenders
this is no link with repeat drunk drivers.
Being caught drinking and driving can
change a person’s life forever and can carry heavy some penalties. So what happens when a person is caught
driving under the influence of alcohol. That
would depend on where a person lives, the number of offenses, and the BAC. The
penalties can range from a simple
fine, to jail time, or rehabilitation. For first time offenders the penalties may not be a harsh, however “each state
determines the severity of the crime and possible punishments. In most states it is a serious criminal
offense, but in other states,
a first-time offense
is merely a civil infraction. In some
states the judge will have
discretion on how to enforce
punishment, while in others the law
calls for mandatory sentences.” (“State-by-State DUI Penalties,” 2016). As previously mentioned, the punishment for
drinking and driving can vary depending
on where a person lives, in the state of Maryland punishments can include
“First-time offenders face a term
of imprisonment of up to one year, payment of a fine of up to $1,000, or both. The driver’s license suspension
period for a first-time offender whose BAC was .08 but less than .15 is 45 days. The suspension period for a first-time
offender whose BAC was .15 or greater
is 90 days. A second violation within five years of the first offense faces a
term of imprisonment of up to two
years, payment of a fine of up to $2,000, or both. A person who commits two or more DUIs in a five-year
period will be required to use an ignition interlock device for three years. Those
who commit a third
or subsequent offense
within a five-year period face a term of imprisonment
of up to three years, payment
of a fine of up
to $3,000, or both.
These offenders will also be required to
use an ignition interlock system for three years.” (“Maryland Drunk Driving Laws,” 2016). Fortunately a judge may
choose to have a person complete rehabilitation. “The rehabilitation approach
argues that offenders
are in need of some
sort of treatment to curb their use and abuse
of alcohol through a variety of interventions.
Emphasis is placed on addressing the
underlying behavior of alcohol use that contributes to further drunk driving
incidents and criminal
offenses. The purpose
of rehabilitation, then,
is to change behavior by treating offenders’ alcohol/drug problem.” (Taxman & Piquero, 1998).
Checking into a rehab
center and attending AA (Alcohol Anonymous) meetings are two popular
rehabilitation treatments available for drunk drivers.
“U.S. culture
is generally tolerant
of alcohol consumption, with two-thirds of Americans reporting that they drink alcohol at
least on occasion” (Bertelli & Richardson, 2008). Drinking alcohol
is considered to be a social event, from dinner parties
involving fine dining, to a college
frat party, most people in the US have
had at least one alcoholic drink and made the conscious decision to get behind the wheel and drive. It is because of
this that the idea of prevention came about.
If drinking and driving can be prevented why not. While there is always the
option to call a cab or assign a designated driver not everyone
plans ahead to do so. It is because no everyone is responsible that each state takes
prevention into their own hands. “Sobriety checkpoints, saturation patrols, open container laws, and media campaigns
related to enforcement efforts are all
enforcement-related strategies for preventing alcohol-impaired driving.”
(Sanem, Ericksin, Rutledge, Lenk, Nelson, Jones-Webb, & Toomey,
2015). Another way to prevent drunk driving is the alcohol interlock programs. “An alcohol ignition interlock
is an alcohol breath detection device
connected to the ignition system of an engine and prevents a driver from starting
a vehicle if his BAC measured from
a provided breath sample is above the preset limit.” (Radun, Ohisalo, Rajalin, Radun, Wahde, & Lajunen,
2014). Alcohol interlock is the most effective measure to prevent drunk driving due to the fact that
the vehicles it is installed into will not start if the driver has consumed
any alcohol. Some devices can even
detect alcohol in a mouth wash or perfume.
Another form of prevention takes the
form of social media. One such organization MADD (Mothers Against Drunk Driving) uses social media in the form of
Facebook, blogs, and campaigns to
reach people on the topic of drunk driving. Their mission is to bring drunk
driving to an end. Not only do they
help victims of drunk drivers but they help the families of said victims and promote public awareness of
the issue at hand, Drunk Driving. They have a 5 year strategic plan that is broken down into 7 parts with three main
parts. The 3 main goals of their plan include:
reaching and serving
more victims, accelerate progress on their campaign which is to eliminate drunk driving, and reduce
drunk and drugged driving while preventing underage drinking with the use of evidence based strategies.
Drinking and driving has devastated
countless people’s lives over the years. The
consequences of drinking and driving not only effects the impaired
drivers but that of many others, from
passengers to others drivers on the road to pedestrians, even family members. A drunk driver sees no age, race, or gender,
striking at any time. By raising awareness to prevent drunk driving with the use of social media campaigns and groups
like MADD, the use of location law
enforcement to set up sobriety checkpoints and randomized breath test the US as
a whole can reduce the number of fatalities involving alcohol related traffic crashes.
References:
Bertelli, A. M., & Richardson
Jr., L. E. (2008). The Behavioral
Impact of Drinking and Driving Laws. Policy
Studies Journal, 36(4),
545-569. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00283.x Retrieved from: http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.umuc.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=55b60a86-
7020-405d-b1f5-5f16ab865e77%40sessionmgr4001&vid=20&hid=4111
Delcher,
C., Johnson, R., & M. Maldonado-Molina, M. (2013). Driving After Drinking Among Young Adults of Different
Race/Ethnicities in the United States:
Unique Risk Factors
in Early Adolescence? Journal of Adolescent
Health, 52(5), 584-591. Retrieved January 24, 2016, from http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy.umuc.edu/science/article/pii/S1054139X12007112
“Effects of Blood
Alcohol Concentration (BAC).”
(2015). Retrieved January
29, 2016, from http://www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/impaired_driving/bac.html
Holzmueller, C.
(2015). Drunk Driving. In Salem Press
Encyclopedia of Health (p. 3). Salem Press Encyclopedia of Health. Retrieved from: http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.umuc.edu/eds/detail/detail?sid=6f13e634-6da6-4887-b801-
34ff78fa88d8%40sessionmgr4005&vid=1&hid=4111&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2
NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=94415400&db=ers
MADD - Mothers Against
Drunk Driving. (2014).
Retrieved January 28, 2016,
from http://www.madd.org/?referrer=http://www.madd.org/drunk-driving/?referrer
“Maryland Drunk Driving Laws. (2016).” Retrieved
February 16, 2016, from https://www.edgarsnyder.com/drunk-driving/driving-alcohol-laws/maryland.html
"Number of Drunk
Driving Deaths Dropped
Below 10,000 in 2014." PRWeb Newswire 25 Nov. 2015.
Business Insights: Essentials. Web. 2 Feb. 2016. Retrieved from: http://bi.galegroup.com.ezproxy.umuc.edu/essentials/article/GALE
%7CA435559442/df8dc2846f9cab5416988296444777f2?u=umd_umuc
Radun, I., Ohisalo, J., Rajalin, S., Radun,
J. E., Wahde, M., & Lajunen, T. (2014). Alcohol Ignition Interlocks in All New
Vehicles: A Broader
Perspective. Traffic Injury Prevention, 15(4), 335-342. doi:10.1080/15389588.2013.825042
Retrieved from:
http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.umuc.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=197f7bff-9cdd-
407e-9680-bb298af5d6cc%40sessionmgr112&vid=8&hid=104
Roudsari, B.,
Ramisetty-Mikler, S., & Rodriguez, L. A.
(2009). Ethnicity, age, and trends in alcohol-related driver fatalities in the United
States. Traffic Injury
Prevention, 10(5), 410-414.
doi:10.1080/15389580903131506 Retrieved from: http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.umuc.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=24953284-9915-
4a98-aa65-1ec8a13dc653%40sessionmgr4004&vid=9&hid=4202
Sanem, J.,
Ericksin, D., Rutledge, P., Lenk, K., Nelson, T., Jones-Webb, R., & Toomey,
T. (2015). Association between alcohol-impaired driving enforcement-related
strategies and alcohol-impaired driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 78,
104-109. Retrieved January 27, 2016,
from http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy.umuc.edu/science/article/pii/S0001457515000676
“State-by-State DUI Penalties” -
FindLaw. (2016). Retrieved February 15, 2016,
from http://dui.findlaw.com/dui-laws-resources/state-by-state-dui-penalties.html
Schofield, T. P., & Denson, T. F. (2013). Temporal Alcohol Availability Predicts First-Time Drunk Driving, but Not Repeat Offending. Plos ONE,
8(8), 1-6. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071169
Retrieved from: http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.umuc.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=d812e333-3fc9-
46c0-ac5b-3e7085baac39%40sessionmgr4003&vid=3&hid=4110
Shah, S. (2015). An Impaired
State of the Law. Brooklyn
Law Review, 80(4),
1611-1639. Retrieved from: http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.umuc.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?
sid=2803df74-0584-4ea0-87ea-79dce3fcfa9e%40sessionmgr120&vid=2&hid=108
Taxman, F., & Piquero, A. (1998). On preventing drunk driving recidivism: An examination of rehabilitation and punishment approaches. Journal
of Criminal Justice,
26(2), 129-143.
Retrieved
February 16, 2016, from http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy.umuc.edu/science/article/pii/S0047235297000755
“Why people drink and drive: the bases of
drinking-and-driving decisions.” (1995). Retrieved from:
http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/32000/32600/32666/why_people_drink_and_drive 4_.pdf
Ulasan
Catat Ulasan